This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ted Kaczynski article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on January 18, 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
Page history
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report7 times. The weeks in which this happened:
The final paragraph under the Arrest section seems hardly relevant as it is disjointed chronologically, but also adds nothing.
If this "Nathan" investigation is important enough to warrant its inclusion, I'd suggest including it somewhere else that works better contextually and chronologically Thnift (talk) 12:53, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, apologies if I am presenting this incorrectly- it is my second time posting on Wikipedia. I am suggesting a few changes to the following sentence at the end of the second paragraph on the page. The sentence currently reads: "He authored a roughly 35,000-word manifesto and social critique called Industrial Society and Its Future (1995) which opposes all forms of technology, rejects leftism and fascism, advocates cultural primitivism, and ultimately suggests violent revolution." In my opinion there are a few issues with this sentence:
1) Kaczynski did not oppose all technology. He opposed industrial technology. I think the word "all" should be replaced with the word "industrial". In the version of ISAIF contained in Technological Slavery Volume 1 (Enhanced Edition), Kaczynski distinguishes between "small-scale" technology and "organization-dependent" technology in a section called Two Kinds of Technology that starts at paragraph 207. Just before this, he writes: "206. With regard to revolutionary strategy, the only points on which we absolutely insist are that the single, overriding goal must be the elimination of modern technology, and that no other goal can be allowed to compete with this one. ..." Considering that Kaczynski isn't shy about stating his opposition to the things he disagrees with, and consistently uses the terms "modern" and "industrial" to describe the technology he is referring to, I don't think it's correct to characterize ISAIF as advocating against all technology- only large-scale, industrial technology.
2) Kaczynski did not reject fascism. I think the words "and fascism" should simply be removed from the sentence. In ISAIF, Kaczynski criticizes “leftism” many times. However, I did not find a rejection of fascism. To the contrary, Kaczynski rejects the idea that changes in the existing political structures of the modern world are necessary, and displays an openness to fascism if it is in service of his anti-industrial ideal. In the section titled Strategy, he states: “193. The kind of revolution we have in mind will not necessarily involve an armed uprising against any government. It may or may not involve physical violence, but it will not be a political revolution. Its focus will be on technology and economics, not politics.” Additionally, in paragraph 195, Kaczynski writes: “…it is argued that if the relatively democratic nations of the world fall behind in technology while nasty, dictatorial nations like China, Vietnam and North Korea continue to progress, eventually the dictators may come to dominate the world. That is why the industrial system should be attacked in all nations simultaneously, to the extent that this may be possible. True, there is no assurance that the industrial system can be destroyed at approximately the same time all over the world, and it is even conceivable that the attempt to overthrow the system could lead instead to the domination of the system by the dictators. That is a risk that has to be taken. And it is worth taking, since the difference between a “democratic” industrial system and one controlled by dictators is small compared with the difference between an industrial system and a non-industrial one. It might even be argued that an industrial system controlled by dictators would be preferable because dictator-controlled systems usually have proven inefficient, hence they are presumably more likely to break down. Look at Cuba.” I think this makes it clear that Kaczynski does not prioritize protection from or opposition to fascism in his political philosophy.
3) I think "rejects leftism" is not strong enough wording to characterize Kaczynski's views on what he calls leftism. I suggest the phrasing "argues with conviction against leftism" instead. In ISAIF, he concludes his argumentation with a section titled "The Danger of Leftism". In this section he writes: "214. ... [A] movement that exalts nature and opposes technology must take a resolutely anti-leftist stance and must avoid all collaboration with leftists. ... Leftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of modern technology. ... Leftism is unlikely to ever give up technology ..."
4) I think cultural primitivism is not a well-enough known term to merit use here. I think an allusion to Kaczynski's idea of the power process would be better, though I'm not sure how to describe the power process concisely so that it can be quickly understood by someone browsing the page. I define the power process as "the opportunity for individuals and small groups to meet their basic needs without assistance from large-scale technologies."
5) Saying the manifesto "ultimately suggests violent revolution" is a bit of a leap- while the manifesto does reference revolutions that involved violence, the manifesto does not explicitly call for violence. Additionally, in paragraph 193, Kaczynski writes: "The kind of revolution we have in mind will not necessarily involve an armed uprising against any government. It may or may not involve physical violence, but it will not be a political revolution. Its focus will be on technology and economics, not politics." I feel that saying the manifesto "ultimately suggests violent revolution" represents a departure from summary into interpretation, and while I do think this interpretation is valid, I don't think it belongs in the summary / introductory paragraph. I'm not saying it's inaccurate, I'm just saying it's either interpretation (which doesn't belong in a summary) or a selective summary (which is dishonest to the actual text).
6) While Kaczynski does not outright call for violence, he does call for revolution rather than reform, and I think using this language is more faithful to the text itself.
My suggestion for the new sentence is: "He authored a roughly 35,000-word manifesto and social critique called Industrial Society and Its Future (1995) which opposes industrial technology, argues with conviction against leftism, stresses the importance of the "power process" (the opportunity for individuals and small groups to meet their basic needs without large-scale technology), calls for revolution against modern technology rather than reform, and discusses the potential future of industrial society."
Additionally, the linked source for this sentence, the article "The Unabomber and the origins of anti-tech radicalism" by Sean Fleming (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13569317.2021.1921940), argues that Kaczynski is a "bioprimitivist" rather than a "cultural primitivist".
The article also does not say Kaczynski rejects fascism.
Lastly, the article agrees with my claim that Kaczynski does not explicitly call for violent revolution in ISAIF, and supports my claim that finding an argument for violence in ISAIF is an act of interpretation: Fleming writes, "Despite the Manifesto’s apparent ambivalence about violence, the revolution that Kaczynski envisions is definitely a violent one. As he reveals in an unpublished essay, ‘In Defense of Violence’, he ‘did not explicitly advocate violence’ in the Manifesto simply because he ‘assumed that the mainstream media would refuse to publish anything that did advocate violence'." In other words, Kaczynski was careful to not suggest violence in the manifesto. Saying his manifesto "ultimately calls for violence" is an act of interpretation, and doesn't belong in a summary of the facts about the manifesto. ~2026-35794-41 (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't we add the fact that Kaczynski was fluent in Spanish, read many books in the Spanish language and requested many books in the Spanish language from his local public library branch, and carried on years-long Spanish-language correspondence with people in Spanish-speaking countries? ~2026-20625-89 (talk) 01:53, 27 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Not done: according to the page's protection level, you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Day Creature (talk) 21:55, 15 June 2026 (UTC)