Talk:Tech for Palestine

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 December 2025. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tech for Palestine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below

You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}} You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:

.ECR-edit-request-warning {
	display: none;
}

Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request

This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction.

You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.

The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:

All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page, except for making constructive edit requests
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 4 August 2025 by reviewer Sionk (talk · contribs).

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

RFC RASR0112176B5

referencia de dinero Rogelio Agustin ramos sanches (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The amount of disruption on Wikipedia

The PW "investigation" showed, on p. 3 (out of 244): "The current conservative edit impact estimate for the group (based on available evidence) is 260 edits on 114 articles.(link) (bolding in the original)

If PW is mentioned, shouldn't that also be in the article, somewhere? Huldra (talk) 22:32, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe wait for the rfc to close?

personally, its delving too much into details and rehashing piratewires coverage for what is supposed to be an encyclopedic summary. Unless another less biased source is also covering, its not the most important to quantify and name every aspect of group.

If folks want the salacious details, they can read PirateWires themselves. User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 02:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the Bloomberg article: «Asked for comment in October [2024], a person who responded to the Zei Squirrel account, which has 272,000 followers, said those efforts had “zero effect.”» Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 07:43, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Paul Biggar

Why does the link to Paul Biggar the supposed founder circle back to the main article on the organisation and not to the person himself? Can someone fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-33993-38 (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As far as i understand, Wikipedia so far has no article dedicated to Paul Biggar. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 09:01, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

removal

This was removed: The "investigation" showed: "The current conservative edit impact estimate for the group (based on available evidence) is 260 edits on 114 articles.(link , on p. 3 (out of 244)) (bolding in the original)

There has been a lot of fuzz about TfP influence on Wikipedia. The above is a link to Rindsberg et al investigation, showing that they identified a full total of 260 edits: I think that is notable. (The way it is presented in certain media, it sounds as if it was millions), cheers, Huldra (talk) 22:19, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth is that a link to? Who or what is Rindsberg? 'Stuff on the internet' does not make a subject notable in Wikipedia terms. Sionk (talk) 23:27, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Rindsberg. Unfortunately it is pretty widely noted, although it is rubbish, IMO. See eg Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Tablet_(magazine), Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_498#RFC:_Reliability_of_Pirate_Wires, Huldra (talk) 23:46, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I plan to remove Pirate Wires (and replace it with Bloomberg and Jewish Insider) because it is an unreliable source in my opinion. Would this removal conform to the recent RFC about Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 498#RFC: Reliability of Pirate Wires ? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 14:03, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pirate Wires isn't cited any longer. So what are you planning to remove? Sionk (talk) 23:21, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excerpt from Special:permalink/1328887890: In 2025, The Jerusalem Post, citing an article by Pirate Wires, reported that Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 19:36, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]