Talk:SkyEurope

This article was nominated for deletion on 2/18/2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the Defunct Airlines task force.

Slovakia Low‑importance

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seized vs. terminated contract

As seen in the article, the contract between GECAS and SkyEurope was terminated, and the aircraft returned to the leasor. The word "seized" was used inappropriately.

fully support! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomzeg (talk • contribs) 22:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correct size?

Fleet size = 19, but 5+6+7=18. Which is wrong? -nagytibi ^{! ?} 16:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consolidated Discussion

In an attempt to have discussion in one spot, please see this discussion of my recent changes. Travellingcari (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JanSuchy

I just would like to point out that the user "JanSuchy" has been systematically trying to collect any negative information he is able to find about this company for about 1.5 months and has been eagerly inserting it in articles in this and other wikipedias. Such a negative eagerness is not normal, most other firms do not receive such a "special treatment" here. He is obviously being paid or has some other very strong motivation for goofing on this firm, so I call upon the admins to do something about that, otherwise this is a very clear case for a court.

After reading an article [1] by Jan Sůra in Mladá Fronta Dnes, I opened a SkyEurope page in Wikipedia to get more info. As the articles on English and other Wikipedias resembled Press Releases, I added more info. As positive info was already there, most of thre sentences I have added were negative. You are welcome to add more sourced info to the articles. Regards JanSuchy (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]