Talk:Microsoft PowerPoint
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microsoft PowerPoint article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| Death by PowerPoint was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 21 September 2011 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Move
[edit]Move it to "PowerPoint" since everyone knows it’s owned by Microsoft and never calls it "Microsoft PowerPoint". Just "PowerPoint" is by far the most common name for it. 2A02:C7C:847D:400:85F7:AD31:45A8:2527 (talk) 16:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Missing and possible incorrect versions.
[edit]The last release listed in the table is PowerPoint 2019 and version 17.0
| 2018 | PowerPoint 2019 | 17.0 | Windows and other OS |
Microsoft has not changed the major number of the version release since 2016.
Since then there has been the release of PowerPoint 2021 and PowerPoint 365.
The version available currently is 16.0.16130.20766 for 2021 and 365. Today is 20 Sep 2023 72.19.162.23 (talk) 21:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Most of the cultural reactions section should be moved to either Slide show or Presentation program
[edit]The vast, vast majority of the cultural reactions in the article are not PowerPoint the program but the use of slideshows as a whole. Nearly all of cultural reactions section should be in either slideshow or Presentation program. I say Slide show because most of the reactions are not even about the use of presentation software but the use of slideshows. Leonard LMT (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
- I agree with this, even if a good amount of the text mentions PowerPoint by name. novov talk edits 08:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose merge. Most of the relevant text appears (to me at least) to talk specifically about PowerPoint, and a quick glance at the sources in that section (or at least their titles) reveals that they tend to focus on PowerPoint as well. I would not be opposed to the creation of a general cultural reactions section for the slideshow article, but I believe that different sources would be needed to accomplish that effectively. BlaqWiedow (talk) 04:19, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Technology
- C-Class vital articles in Technology
- C-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- C-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Low-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
