Talk:Lightning records
Appearance
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lightning records article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Lightning records appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 September 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here.No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Earth605 talk 12:10, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that there was a lightning bolt 829 kilometers (515 miles) long?
- ALT1: ... that a lightning flash 829 kilometers (515 miles) long set a record 8 years later? Source: https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/wmo-certifies-megaflash-lightning-record-usa
- ALT2: ... that only one known lightning bolt was more than 500 miles long? Source: https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/wmo-certifies-megaflash-lightning-record-usa
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Prudence (novel)
Created by SpiralShell (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
SpiralShell (talk) 20:11, 11 August 2025 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, 16% on Earwig, and QPQ is done. It is neutralk to me, Hook is cited and in the article. Minor issues: the text Thus the maximum energy of lightning is not known with certainty.
on "Highest energy" is unreferenced. Pinging @SpiralShell: for responce Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 08:04, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you @Miminity:! I have re-written the referenced statement and added a citation. SpiralShell (talk) 22:27, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Good to go then.
Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:19, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Good to go then.
- Thank you @Miminity:! I have re-written the referenced statement and added a citation. SpiralShell (talk) 22:27, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
@Miminity and SpiralShell: Reviewing for promotion, and I find the source does not describe the record event as a lightning bolt
but as alightning flash
or amegaflash
. I am not a meteorology expert so I am not sure if the two terms are synonymous, but since the hook doesn't match the source precisely I don't feel comfortable promoting without discussion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:44, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Miminity and SpiralShell: Thoughts?--Launchballer 15:19, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your attention to detail on this. I don't really have the capacity right now to get into the question of if the two terms are synonymous. So I propose simply replacing "lightning bolt" with "lightning flash" or "flash of lightning" in the hook. SpiralShell (talk) 03:04, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. I've updated ALT1 and am approving it to be moved into a prep area. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:42, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- List-Class Weather articles
- Low-importance Weather articles
- List-Class Thunderstorm and tornado articles
- Low-importance Thunderstorm and tornado articles
- WikiProject Severe weather articles
- WikiProject Weather articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles

