Talk:Heinlein (crater)

Astronomy: Mars / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mars task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Having a great day Mariamnei, thanks. The cited U.S. governmental source covers the concern, please give it a read, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Randy Kryn - Thank you for your response. Articles should still ideally not be based on one source, and I am therefore raising this here. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mariamnei. Ideally but not necessary for things like craters or artworks when referenced by government or museum sources. Your action has helped to correct the numbers, which for some reason were inaccurate even though the source clearly shows them, thanks for that. As I mentioned in my note at my talk page that you left (thanks, I may have missed this), I did not create this page but rescued it from one of those redirectswithoutdisccusion actions, which should be outlawed on Wikipedia for pages which have at least one good source. My fave rescue was of Clarence Odbody years ago, which had been redirected without discussion and nobody caught it until Clarence led me to it (he thought I was going to jump but was just admiring the river). Randy Kryn (talk) 12:34, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]