Jump to content

Talk:Hagia Sophia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeHagia Sophia was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 27, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 7, 2004, December 27, 2008, December 27, 2009, December 27, 2010, December 27, 2012, December 27, 2014, December 27, 2022, and December 27, 2024.

Conservation

[edit]

There has been some recent news about the building's physical state and conservation, namely: concerns about ongoing deterioration of the structure (recently prompted by a report in a Turkish news source and then repeated by several Greek outlets [1], [2], [3], [4]) and a recent Turkish government declaration in September that a 50-year restoration would commence to repair damages ([5], [6]). Things like this probably deserve a mention somewhere. I'm wondering whether they belong towards the end of the current history section, or are perhaps better suited for a "Conservation" section (focused on present-day conservation) in the future? Any thoughts welcome. R Prazeres (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No

[edit]

How could you possibly in common sense say that it was built as an Eastern Orthodox Church when they didn’t exist yet. There was only one church until the schism that church called themselves Catholic. you should stop trying to change church and Christian history Fleurdesboiteaux (talk) 00:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fleurdesboiteaux The proper academic term pre-schism would be Chalcedonian, not Catholic. Your infobox changes are therefore not accurate.
It might indeed be strange to talk about an "Eastern Orthodox" church in the 4th century, however, and the article body (though not the infobox) seems to do that. Perhaps that could be changed. Uness232 (talk) 02:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If Chalcedonian is the correct term for the period in history, then it should be used. Wikipedia should not rewrite history. Mjroots (talk) 05:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chalcedonian is used when comparing the Byzantine church to that of the Copts, Armenians, Nestorians, etc. The West was Chalcedonian too, but Catholic is used for the pre-Schism church there; the only NPOV approach is to continue to use Orthodox for the pre-Schism Byzantine church in the East, as is convention. Katechon08 (talk) 09:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation

[edit]

Can a knowledgeable editor please add a pronunciation guide for the name? I have heard several variants: "hiyah", "hag-ia" (rhyming with bag-ia), "hawge-ia", "haag-ya" (rhyming with egg-ya) etc. 03:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC) Ross Fraser (talk) 03:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2026

[edit]

Change Asia Orthodox to Eastern Orthodox Kotsios810 (talk) 16:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I have reverted the edits by User:Cheesepizzaaa that changed "Eastern Orthodox" to "Asian Orthodox" without explanation. The user is currently temporarily blocked. Day Creature (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]