This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Funeral doom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Funeral doom is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal
Lil Sad Lil Happy, do you have some reliable sources that use the term "Funeral doom metal"? The source you brought here before doesn't comply with the WP:RS guidelines, so there's a need for another one to support the terminology. ABC paulista (talk) 21:39, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of the places where I've seen it called such were sites like Metal Archives,, which is obviously not a reliable source and so I didn't use that – when I have a moment I'll dig deeper. I'm fine with the article itself being called simply "funeral doom", but it's mostly when I saw that IP edit you reverted, it caught my eye that nowhere on the page "funeral doom metal" as a name is mentioned, which is not a big deal to me. But I still thought it was worth including somewhere per mos:BOLDALTNAMES - Lil Happy Lil Sad:):00:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted because they changed the infobox header, which MOS:INFOBOXNAME advises that shoud have the same title as the article. But the template has a parameter for alternative nomenclatures called "other names", which should be the proper place to accomodate it. Still, there's the issue of the lack of relaible sources using it. ABC paulista (talk) 03:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
