Jump to content

Talk:Externality

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Kentucky supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Negative Production Externality Figure Incorrect?

[edit]

This url shows a different figure for negative externality in production. https://www.economicsonline.co.uk/market_failures/externalities.html/

Logically, the wiki figure is incorrect. A negative externality in production means that the socially optimal production should be lower and the equilibrium price should be higher. The figure has all of this backwards. An example to consider is pollution from a factory; negative externality in production. Society would be better off with less production from the factory with less pollution and a higher price for the factory output. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opulent1 (talkcontribs) 23:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided to remove it, along with the positive production externality figure, as it is also incorrect. Surprised it wasn't removed earlier. ARandomName123 (talk) 15:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect production externality graphs

[edit]

Both graphs for the positive and negative production externalities are incorrect.

Please see: Negative externalities (economicsonline.co.uk) and Positive Externalities - Economics Help.

The creator of the graphs seems to have flipped private marginal cost and social marginal cost. I've decided to remove both graphs, but a second opinion would be appreciated, along with a check of the other two graphs. ARandomName123 (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Origin

[edit]

While not exactly naming it as such, Marx did talk about the concept in his works. MisterCauliflower2137 (talk) 13:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Likely AI text

[edit]

Hi - I tagged this article as likely AI generated, as the edits by Talejaschulze and Roy Melki display strong indicators of LLM use, and thus the text needs review for accuracy, source-to-text integrity, original research/editorializing, and the like. Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]