Talk:Ewuare/GA1
Appearance
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Vanderwaalforces (talk · contribs) 00:38, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 04:14, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Will review for WP:GARC. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 04:14, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
| 1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
| 1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
| 2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
| 2c. it contains no original research. | ||
| 2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
| 4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
| 5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
| 6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
| 6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
| 7. Overall assessment. | ||
Issues
[edit]- Lead
Traditions about his birth and youth connect him with the Ekoko n'Utẹ masquerade, the market woman Emotan, and conflicts involving the Ogiamiẹn lineage.
this sentence seems pretty vague, like what tradtions?- Reworded. -VWF
- Lead
Ewuare strengthened royal power and reshaped Benin from a polity limited by hereditary chiefs into a more centralised kingdom.
according to who? please add attribution per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV- I removed this since I prefer not to do attribution of a statement like that in the lead. -VWF
- Lead
and institutions that became central to Benin government and kingship
this seems slightly biased- Fixed. -VWF
- Background You use Serial comma in the lead but in
included Ohen, Egbeka, Orobiru and Uwaifiokun
, you do not include it. Please remain consistent with types of commas.- Fixed. -VWF
- Background
and weak administration
→and a weak administration
- Fixed. -VWF
- Background
Jacob Egharevba in A Short History of Benin
→Jacob Egharevba, in A Short History of Benin,
- Fixed. -VWF
- Background
while Sandomirsky gives his reign
→while Sandomirsky affixes his reign
- Fixed. -VWF
- Background Who are Sandomirsky, Millar, and Bradbury? Please add their full names and link (or add their occupation) in their first mention
- Fixed. -VWF
- Background
mother's name, giving forms such as
→mother's name, naming her
- Fixed. -VWF
- Background
Elere, Elẹrẹ, Eleye or Onhẹrẹn
please be consistent- Fixed. -VWF
- Background
Some accounts place his birth within stories about Ohen's hidden relationship with a woman at Utẹ, a town across the Ikpoba River.
this is slightly confusing. Was his birth story placed in those stories or was he actually born when Ohen had the hidden relationship?- Both (the birth stories and Ohen's hidden relationship) were connected at least from what I can find. That is where the different names of Ogun's mother come into play, they all have different details as the article rightly says. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:44, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- Background
powerful native doctor, and
remove comma- Fixed. -VWF
- Background
after divinatory intervention
→after divine intervention
- Fixed. -VWF
- Background
Ohen's paralysis to medicine placed in his path
what does "placed in his path" mean? please reword it- Reworded. -VWF
- Background
Ogiamiẹn family and to a treaty condition
"treaty condition" is duplicate- Fixed. -VWF
- Background
and courtiers
please link courtiers to Courtier- Done. -VWF
- Background
harmful medicine beneath the bridge and another medicine at Utẹ
→harmful medicines beneath the bridge and at Utẹ
- Done. -VWF
- Background what is "raffia"?
- Raffia there is the natural fiber made from the leaves of the Raphia farinifera, I linked it now. -VWF
- Accession Please be consistent with Ewuare's name before the coronation and keep it as Ogun, especially in the third paragraph; it makes it look like Ogun and Ewuare are different people
- I did some tweak in this regard. -VWF
- Accession
Later memorial trees died
→The memorial trees later died
- Fixed. -VWF
- Reign
Another tradition explains Edo body marks as originating in Ewuare's attempt to identify subjects who had fled after his mourning laws caused depopulation.
although there are longer sentences than this one, this needs commas or reorganization, as this tackles too much topics at once- Tried splitting. -VWF
- Court culture and religion
with royal ritual
is this supposed to be plural?- Okay. -VWF
- Court culture and religion
political importance in the order associated with his rule
"in the order" sounds vague and confusing, I believe you should change it topolitical importance during his rule
- Done. -VWF
- Court culture and religion
The account may reflect a shift
→This account reflected a shift
I do not know why "may" was there, as, unless the source is unsure, it reflected a difference in hierarchy- Done. -VWF
- Court culture and religion
Ubi refused relations with the Oba
this is vague and confusing, as the previous sentence just stated that the Oba married Ubi. Does this mean Ubi did not want to be related to the Oba or did Ubi publicly say that the marriage was false?- Yeah, Ubi didn't want it. I've clarified. -VWF
- Court culture and religion
palace with ritual escort by the Ihogbe
→palace ritually escorted by the Ihogbe
- Done. -VWF
- Court culture and religion
to be cared for, and she gave birth
→to be cared for, giving birth
- Done. -VWF
- Court culture and religion
kolanuts and coconuts
→kola nuts and coconuts
- Done. -VWF
- Court culture and religion
begins with a Ubi phase involving
→begins with an Ubi phase, involving
- Done. -VWF
- Court culture and religion
and palace groups including the Ihogbe ancestral priests
→and palace groups, including the Ihogbe ancestral priests,
- Done. -VWF
- Foreign contact and trade
accompanied the King of
→accompanied the king of
- Done. -VWF
- Foreign contact and trade
about forty miles upriver and nineteen miles overland
MOS:NUMERAL, MOS:CONVERSION- Done. -VWF
- Foreign contact and trade
after about thirty years
MOS:NUMERAL- Done. -VWF
- Family and succession
Guida Myrl Jackson-Laufer in Encyclopedia
add "the" before "Encyclopedia"- Done. -VWF
- Family and succession
ruled for only fourteen days
MOS:NUMERAL- Done. -VWF
- Family and succession I suggest you change the section name to "Family and death", as I believe his death is more significant in this article than the people who succeed him.
- I agree. -VWF
@Vanderwaalforces: I have finally finished the prose review. The spotcheck will either come today or tomorrow. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 01:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- @TheNuggeteer You're awesome. I have fixed all. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:58, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- Spotcheck
- 1.

- 11.

- 12.

- 13.

- 14.

- 17.

- 18.

- 20.

- 21.

- 23.

- 1.
- Everything looks good sourcewise.
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter")09:05, 14 June 2026 (UTC)- I have done a minor edit; I think this is good to pass now. Great work on this interesting article!
🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter")09:08, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
- I have done a minor edit; I think this is good to pass now. Great work on this interesting article!
- Spotcheck
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.