This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Elvis Presley article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elvis Presley, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elvis PresleyWikipedia:WikiProject Elvis PresleyTemplate:WikiProject Elvis PresleyElvis Presley
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
There is a request, submitted by Wcamp9 (talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.
The rationale behind the request is: One of the most important musicians in rock and roll history.
Cause of death gives the balanced views of various experts. Please note that although Nichopoulos, Presley's main physician, was at the time "exonerated of criminal liability for the singer's death, ... His license was suspended for three months. It was permanently revoked in the 1990s after the Tennessee Medical Board brought new charges of over-prescription." Consensus among regular editors who judge it important to preserve a reliable, mainstream view in this encyclopedia article is that the discredited doctor's opinions, such as those published in his 2010 book, and including his attempt to emphasize constipation as the likely cause of death, should not be propagated by Wikipedia, and hence receive no coverage in this article.
To your point; regardless of the validity of the sources; this article vested by it's editors will keep "CHERRY PICKING" the sources that they deemed at their convenience "acceptable". It's a shame, for at one time, the articles, including but not limited to, the "best selling artist" article/listing, were trustworthy and credible. To reiterate, it's a shame..... Victor0327 (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The final tally—602.4 million units—was published in the IFPI Global Music Report 2026, Appendix D: “Historic Artist Certification Audit.” It reflects cumulative sales from 1954 through December 31, 2025. ~2026-17621-78 (talk) 15:16, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I found the page recently online. It definitely is very interesting and makes sense to me, but I wish there were a better breakdown regarding the numbers they are using. Grandmajohnnym (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
As one of the most iconic figures ever, Elvis is instantly recognizable. That's obvious and made clear on the Wikipedia page, and he was one of the most photographed icons in the 50s. I believe that the image on Wikipedia is sufficient, but puts Elvis in a somewhat awkward position. On Wikipedia and beyond, there is many better pictures of him in the public domain. I suggest we swtich. Along with many publicity photos which, using {{publicity photo}} on commons as a license, may make most images of him public domain, as the laws are loose. I use this sometimes when uploading images, but I believe that there are better ways to find images with more sufficient methods. Also checking the copyright registry pre-1989 would be useful
One picture I found was on newspapers, and users like @999real and @Michael0986 may know about this: Color photos like this: [1] and this one I found of Cary Grant can be found on New York Sunday News (on Newspapers.com, New York Daily News), on the cover of the Coloroto section. The newspaper did not have its copyright during most years where Elvis was most popular. This should be a hub for Elvis pics, especially in color. Photos of Elvis and many other vintage celebs can be found there, and color and high quality photos of Elvis can be found if color is the preference, It is also useful for other vintage celebrities.
One of the first two images is clearly flipped, so we'd have to figure out which before using either. Beyond that, provided an image is genuinely copyright free it really comes down to aesthetics, and personally I like the image currently in use, it isn't as obviously posed, and has a dynamism that matches his early performing style. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:31, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I'm following most of what you've written about copyright nor does it seem that you have a complete understanding of which images carry a copyright and what public domain means. However, the matter of "there is better pictures of him in the public domain" is certainly subjective and up for discussion. I don't agree that any of the examples you provided are objectively better than what's in the lead now, but I'm certain others will weigh in. --Laser brain(talk)18:34, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
that is subjective but there are definitely better photos of Elvis outside of Wikipedia, and there is definitely one that is public domain under laws which were a bit loose in the 50s Wcamp9 (talk) 02:23, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I like the fourth picture, but the current one isn't awful either. It shows him doing what he is notable for: performing, and one of his most notable songs to boot. I would strongly oppose image 2, as it's badly colourized, and image 5 since it has a signature over it. I noticed that there seems to be a large influx in celebrity publicity photos being uploaded to Commons: is there a particular reason for this? ~2026-19166-54 (talk) 16:37, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
My feeling is that the photos for Elvis-themed pages should all be different (i.e. the discography photos), but I have no preferences beyond that. Grandmajohnnym (talk) 13:23, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The current infobox image has been in the article for a long time and it remains my overall choice. I don't think that any of the images suggested here are an improvement. The current image shows Elvis performing at the height of his fame.--♦IanMacM♦(talk to me)16:58, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, a few months ago I had an edit here reverted because it was deemed "unsourced and unnecessary." Ignoring the fact the source is in the sentence I posted, does anybody here feel it's unnecessary?:
"According to Joel Whitburn's Top R&B Singles book, only Fats Domino had more hits charted than Presley's 33 during 1956-63. No other white artist comes close for those years."
Since the R&B charts are a reflection of the tastes of black music fans of that genre (especially back in the '50s), wouldn't the fact that they loved Elvis almost as much as white fans during that era be of significance for that section? I certainly feel having more hits than Sam Cooke, James Brown, Ray Charles, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, etc. is relevant for this discussion, but what say you? Grandmajohnnym (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Elvis was the king. Stat wise he is the king of popular music, plus a TOP BOX OFFICE DRAW.The editors who run this page are biased and will not put any positive changes on this article. One even stated elvis was not global, which is absurd. ~2026-35266-78 (talk) 16:50, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]