Talk:Electrohomeopathy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Electrohomeopathy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent removal

Regarding this recent removal and edit summary "this quote or any mention of electrohomeopathy or Mattei is nowhere in the ref" [1]. This is not accurate.

The paper can be read here in full [2]. On page 238 we find:

"The electro-homeopathic system is an invention of Count Mattei who prates of "red," "blue," and "green" electricity, a theory that, in spite of its utter idiocy, has attracted a considerable following and earned a large fortune for its chief promoter".

On this article, the removed text contained a quote which was "The electrohomeopathic system is an invention of Count Mattei who prates of "red," "blue," and "green" electricity, a theory that has attracted a considerable following and earned a large fortune for its chief promoter".

A user [3] removed "in spite of its utter idiocy" which is dishonest editing. Old versions of the article contain the full quote [4]. I suggest we restore the full quote and not the dishonest cherry-picking of the quote. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The source you added twice was [5] which is a different source than the one above and it did not contain the quote. Sjö (talk) 06:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, sorry about that. The confusion stems from the fact this is a 2-part article. The paper that was originally on the article for a long time was the "concluded" version which didn't contain the quote. Psychologist Guy (talk) 07:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article could be expanded. Search on Hathitrust or JSTOR for "Matteism", many other historical sources exist. For example, journals of the time dismissed it at quackery [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] etc. These may not all be reliable but a lot of sources exist that mention "Matteism", it is what electrohomeopathy was originally known as. I will have a look for other sources on this at a later date. Psychologist Guy (talk) 07:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable source

The website electropathy.info fails WP:RS; I suggest that we remove this source from the article which is currently being used in the lead. The source was added by Vedantsethia who may have a WP:COI with this website as seen from their talk-page. Psychologist Guy (talk) 12:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't describe what it actually is well enough is or exact methods

I am by no means arguing this isn't completely bogus, but I don't need the article to condescendingly tell me how it's pseudoscience 50 times and not just tell me what exactly what they actually did. 73.215.14.215 (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recognition of electropathy

rajasthan govt (india ) recognised electropathy under act 2018 ~2026-33637-52 (talk) 12:29, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that just crazy? - Walter Still not in the Epstein Files Ego 13:18, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Even if this were true - we need a published reliable source, which you haven't provided - it wouldn't be of any great significance, since 'recognition' by random governments, local or national, is no indication of medical merit. For that, we'd need scientific citations, per WP:MEDRS, not the opinions of politicians. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]