Talk:Eagleowl
Appearance
| This article was nominated for deletion on 9 November 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Band have repeated coverage in national media, have released critically acclaimed records and have played at notable festivals. Seeyoubye (talk) 22:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Band appear to meet musician and ensemble notability criteria 1,7,10. --Empanda (talk) 22:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
RE: Concern over GHITs - the band comprise the two top hits for "eagleowl" on google. Seeyoubye (talk) 22:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Cleanup and sources
[edit]I've cleaned up the article a bit... the wiki markup was a bit of a mess. Additional sources can be found here. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Scotland articles
- Low-importance Scotland articles
- All WikiProject Scotland pages
- C-Class Alternative music articles
- Low-importance Alternative music articles
- WikiProject Alternative music articles
