Talk:Drop (breakdancing move)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Dance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance

WikiProject Dance To-do list:

To nominate at WP:FAC:
To improve to Featured standard:
To nominate as a Good article:
To expand: 18th century dance - 20th century ballet - Bolero - Choreography on Broadway - Dance education - English ballet - Indian classical dance - Italian ballet - List of dance companies - Meg Stuart - Opera ballet - Sasha Waltz - Scotch reel - Set dance - Physically integrated dance
To cleanup: Contra dance - Salsa (dance) - Dandiya - Lead and follow
To unbias:
To check for copyvios:
To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion
Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs
To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more
Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine
To create: Country Western Dance International - Dance and cinema - Dance and society - German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - more
Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images

It is requested that one or more video files be included in this article to improve its quality.

Requested move 5 January 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Overall, there's a rough consensus for the proposed move. The lone oppose isn't really opposing on the merits of the request, merely that the commenter thinks the articles should be merged or deleted. That's an entirely separate question though, which doesn't affect this one. It was also suggested that we could use breakdance move instead of breakdancing move, but the response to this was that breakdancing is more common, so overall the original proposal seems more favoured. — Amakuru (talk) 12:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

– B-boy redirects to Breakdancing so the disambiguation should also use the article name. Gonnym (talk) 15:11, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The relevant category is Category:Breakdance moves. The disambiguation tag should probably be consistent with it; either move the category, or move articles to Foo (breakdance move). 162 etc. (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at our coverage of breakdancing topics, the gerund seems to be the most commonly used term to describe the dance, so moving the category (and its parent, Category:Breakdance) is probably the best approach on this point. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. We lose out on a bit of concision but I think it's a worthwhile trade-off for getting a more recognizable (and gender-neutral) term. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose All seem to fail WP:GNG, Wikipedia is not a breakdancing guide. They should be nom'd for deletion or merger before any sort of move is discussed. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:25, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - No encyclopedic value in these being separate articles. These instead should be merged, which moots this move request. -- Netoholic @ 17:37, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.