Talk:Claude Mythos

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Artificial Intelligence Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Security Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer security (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:

How you can help:

Add to your watchlist the project talk page! Post there for help with articles or to suggest articles that need work.
Request customized editing suggestions on your talk page by entering WikiProject_Computer_security into this template.
Check the article alerts to participate in deletion discussions, review Good Article nominees, and review draft articles.
Edit any articles that interest you. Recommended:
Review recent discussions on related articles.
Replace deprecated archival service links.
Fix something on the list of articles that need cleanup, including:
- Clarification needed
- Rewrite needed
- Expansion needed
- Style editing needed
- Update needed
- Orphaned (add links from other articles to these articles)
- Conflict of interest
- Original research
- Promotional tone
- Biographies of living persons (BLP) articles lacking sources
- Cites no sources
- Cites unreliable sources

Of the 3593 articles in this project 1978 or 55% are marked for cleanup, with 4023 issues in total.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Text or other creative content from this version of Claude (language model) was copied or moved into Claude Mythos with this edit on 30 May 2026. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Git repository information.

The repository may be https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code

though there is also OpenMythos a theoretical reconstruction not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Anthropic or any of their proprietary systems.

That repository may be at https://github.com/kyegomez/OpenMythos/

Should the claude-code repository be added to this page or is Claude Mythos not based on part of that claude-code code but shares that claude name? I do not yet know a repository for the large language model/data/code that works with any of this type of software.

Other Cody (talk) 18:26, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Claude Code is a coding agent. OpenMythos is an effort to recreate Mythos. Neither should be on the page. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:41, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Second Anthropic link in see also

@Maxeto0910: Instead of edit warring with two different editors over this, please explain on the talk page why a PR announcement blog post belongs in the external links section when we already have a link to the official website for the product. I dispute that this clearly belong here as an exception to Wikipedia's norms for these kinds of links. As a primary source, it could be cited (again) as a citation for specific, non-controversial details. Otherwise, this is just corporate bloat without context.

As I assume we all already know, Wikipedia explicitly isn't intended to be a directory, nor is it a platform for PR. Grayfell (talk) 01:27, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

[...] with two different editors over this [...]

Well, you two had different rationales for not including the link, neither of which I think applies.

[...] please explain on the talk page why a PR announcement blog post belongs in the external links section when we already have a link to the official website for the product

I pretty much implicitly did so in my edit summary by quoting from the guideline. I'd argue that the page provides unique and valuable information that is not covered by the other external link. If we had to provide only one link, I'd even argue that it makes more sense to only include the latter.

I dispute that this clearly belong here as an exception to Wikipedia's norms for these kinds of links.

Okay. Why?

As a primary source, it could be cited (again) as a citation for specific, non-controversial details.

If there aren't any third-party sources available for verifying a claim, sure.

Otherwise, this is just corporate bloat without context.

How is it without context? It provides specific information about both models, including examples of use cases, benchmarks, results, feedback, videos, links, and more. Not wanting to include a useful link simply because it is from the company behind the product seems pretty biased. Maxeto0910 (talk) 01:44, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]