Talk:Charles Radcliffe
| The content of Heatwave (magazine) was merged into Charles Radcliffe on 8 November 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| It is requested that an image or photograph of Charles Radcliffe be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Untitled
[edit]The reference to The Rebel Worker links to the Australian journal published in 1980s and NOT the one that came out of Chicago in the 60s. On the Australian page for RW there is a disclaimer stating that the OZ RW has no relationship to the Chicago one that preceded it by 20 years. Actually I believe that the IWW had a publication called the Rebel Worker in the 20s? Not certain about that. - Bernard Marszalek — Preceding unsigned comment added by AkaPaulLafargue (talk • contribs) 02:29, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]I propose merging Heatwave (magazine) into Charles Radcliffe. Both of these articles are quite short and there is reasonable overlap.
I've not done one of these before so let me know if anything isn't in accordance with wiki procedures. John Eden (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- @John Eden: The proposal is fine; thanks for starting it! The only procedural problems are that you should only set up a discussion in one location, ideally on the talk page of your preferred destination (this page). Also, if you have a proposed direction (as you do), use template:merge from and template:merge to on the respective pages. That way, it's easier for editors to see the proposal more clearly and quickly; it also helps to move the discussion on, if the starting point is more explicit. Using those template means that you don't have to use the discuss parameter in the merge template. Klbrain (talk) 08:37, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 08:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks for the guidance and doing the merge. John Eden (talk) 16:54, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
