This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Caucasian race article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour.
Serious encyclopedias: Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Wikipedia aspires to be such a respected work.
Obvious pseudoscience: Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus, such as Time Cube, may be so labeled and categorized as such without more justification.
Generally considered pseudoscience: Theories which have a following, such as astrology, but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community may properly contain that information and may be categorized as pseudoscience.
Questionable science: Theories which have a substantial following, such as psychoanalysis, but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized.
Alternative theoretical formulations: Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process.
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-03-18. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Western Asia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia
Hi Laterthanyouthink, it seems we are already working towards a solution, but perhaps I might remind you of WP:ONUS. Since this article is about the obsolete concept of a Caucasian race and not about the term Caucasian, I don't think we should give to too much prominence to the latter. That one study used the term is surely not relevant unless discussed in secondary sources. Rsk6400 (talk) 07:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not too fussed about whether the study is mentioned or not (and haven't gone looking for others), but I do think it is necessary to distinguish the use of the term in Australia, which appears to be different from usage in the US, so I don't think that the lead is quite correct as it stands, and nor do the citations support what it says there. In Australia, Caucasian is not used as a definition of race in any census, nor by anyone to denote a concept of race, only by the police forces as a descriptor of appearance. I am making this point in the article to demonstrate that the term is not obsolete nor criticised in Australia. In my opinion the whole article needs to be restructured per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, but I don't have the time nor will to do that now. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The section regarding Australia is horribly referenced. The links are out of date and make no reference whatsoever to "Caucasian". I'd edit it myself but it's locked. The entire reference to Australia should be removed in the interest of integrity. ~2026-28564-54 (talk) 07:57, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]