Talk:CSS Livingston

CSS Livingston has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 29, 2026. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start..

North8000 (talk) 13:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

CSS Livingston model.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Pass. MSincccc (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:CSS Livingston/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 04:45, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 15:16, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Prose

Both Livington and Livingston are used in the prose. Are these interchangeable names, since "Livington" has more appearances in the article text?
- No, Livington is a spelling error which occurred because I wrote much of the article after 10:00 at night. Hog Farm _Talk 19:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You could link to "warship".
- Linked in the lead. Hog Farm _Talk 19:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You could consider using the inflation parameter to denote what the $42,000 or $80,000 would be worth today.
- Due to the hyperinflation of Confederate currency I don't think there's any way to produce remotely accurate inflation estimates. Hog Farm _Talk 19:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Way → Frederick Way
- Since it is his first mention in the prose. You might also consider describing him briefly.
- I've just attributed this to Way's Packet Directory; the link for the book is actually a piped link going to the author's page. Hog Farm _Talk 19:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Launched by at least January 1862,[4] and was commissioned later that month under the command of First Lieutenant Francis B. Renshaw.
- The sentence is grammatically incorrect.
  - Fixed Hog Farm _Talk 19:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MSincccc (talk) 08:25, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Images

A simple Google search led me to a 3D model of CSS Livington. Are there any usable images of it on Commons? MSincccc (talk) 16:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- MSincccc - I belive that's somebody's commercial (and presumably copyrighted) 3D printer model of uncertain accuracy. A version of that file was deleted off of Commons as a copyright violation several years ago. I am unaware of any period depiction of this vessel. Hog Farm _Talk 19:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Source-to-text spot check

1- Done

Hog Farm I could only access reference no. 1. Could you please let me know of any way to access the rest of the sources? MSincccc (talk) 07:11, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I can either provide quotes from the sources or email you scans of selected items. Hog Farm _Talk 15:44, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I typically spot-check 5–6 sources (2–3 for shorter articles) before completing a spotcheck. Scans of selected items for 2–3 sources (except no. 1, which I have already checked) would be appreciated. MSincccc (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@MSincccc: - I've got photos/scans of Canney pp. 150-151 and the page from Way. The email this user doesn't appear to have a function to attach files so if you'll send me a wikimail I'll respond with the scans for Canney & Way. McCaul is available through Project Muse on the Wikipedia Library. If there are specific pages of Chatelain that you would like to look at, I can send scans of those, too. Hog Farm _Talk 01:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see an “Email this user” option on your user page. Would you mind initiating the Wikimail so I can receive the scans? MSincccc (talk) 07:29, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2- Done
3- Done
4- Done
5- Done

MSincccc (talk) 09:34, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]