This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
I have added additional sources to support the content. I am attempting to show a correlation between the candidates running and the political party involved. While the party operates locally, it is part of a larger organizational structure. I believe the candidates and the party go hand-in-hand, as their platforms, endorsements, and affiliations are closely aligned. This connection is relevant to understanding the political context.
Comment: Two of the three New York Times articles do not cover the Bronx Conservative Party at all; the 2nd NYT ref provides only trivial coverage. The others are either not indpendent or via local press. (The Daily News is a valid source, but it's behind a paywall, and even if it's 100% about the Bronx Conservative Party, it, on its own, does not establish notability. JSFarman (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This article is largely based on a couple of primary sources and reporting from the local newspaper Bronx Times-Reporter, most of which seems fairly routine. I believe the references here do not establish notability, and better coverage will be required from a wider range of independent publications. MediaKyle (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.It is impossible to provide a review until you have finalised your referencing. This is WP:BOMBARD, whcih generally signifies an advertisement 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 12:23, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I have updated the citations by removing references from local media outlets that may be considered questionable. I retained MeidasTouch News because I believe it contributes to presenting a fuller picture of the subject while maintaining balance, particularly in relation to controversy. The source also allows the statement to be challenged or reviewed if necessary. EliTfab01 (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Two of the three New York Times articles do not cover the Bronx Conservative Party at all; the 2nd NYT ref provides only trivial coverage. The others are either not indpendent or via local press. (The Daily News is a valid source, but it's behind a paywall, and even if it's 100% about the Bronx Conservative Party, it, on its own, does not establish notability. JSFarman (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2025 (UTC)