Jump to content

Talk:Be Sweet to Me

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]

Converted from a redirect by Zmbro (talk) and Chchcheckit (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

zmbro (talk) (cont) 15:43, 5 June 2026 (UTC).[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Expanded within the 7 day window (28 May had 31 words, versus the present 1600+). High copyvio reading is from cited quotes. My advice would be not just pasting quotes, but cutting them down and rephrasing in your own words. Due to the high reading, I feel like you guys need to cut down on the quotes; e.g. you don't need the full quote of her saying it's an injoke, just say she said it was an injoke. @Zmbro and Chchcheckit: jolielover♥talk 11:00, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

*gal also i haven't written much of the prose here but yes agreed // Chchcheckit (talk) 11:07, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
...I'm also a "gal", I consider and use "guys" in a gender-neutral way jolielover♥talk 12:53, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That's definitely on me, I started to wonder if it was too quote heavy. I'll do some paraphrasing and report back to you! – zmbro (talk) (cont) 16:04, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Jolielover I apologize for the delay. How's it look now? Last time I checked, the detector was picking up simple things like studios and album titles rather than full quotes. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 14:34, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Jolielover I condensed and reworded some quotes. I re-checked the copyvio detector and we should be good to go now! – zmbro (talk) (cont) 21:04, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a bunch! Passed; lot less quotes now. jolielover♥talk 05:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Be Sweet to Me/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Zmbro (talk · contribs) 21:07, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 11:41, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! I will be reviewing this article for WP:GABD, expect the initial remarks soon! Vestrian24Bio 11:10, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
Be Sweet to Me (as of this rev)

Vestrian24Bio 11:10, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Zmbro: that's all I got, ping me when you're done addressing these.. Vestrian24Bio 11:10, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Vestrian24Bio Thanks for reviewing! Everything is all set. Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns! – zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:23, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Source spot-check

[edit]
Reference # Letter Source Archive Status Notes
Background
Violet Grohl said in an interview that she does not care about her status as a nepo baby:
2 a thefortyfive.com web.archive.org Good
Recording
Grohl did not play any instruments on the album, saying that she felt shy and outclassed by the skilled musicians around her.
15 a themusic.com.au web.archive.org Good
The first song recorded was "Thum",
9 b kerrang.com web.archive.org Good
Composition
She said in a statement: "There's something so powerful about that period of music, from the messaging to the visuals, it's authentic and raw."
11 c rollingstone.com web.archive.org Good
Grohl explained that because she often used visual and symbolic imagery in her music, her songs combined her love of cinema and music.
15 f themusic.com.au web.archive.org Good
Release and promotion
and "Cool Buzz" on April 28.
30 nme.com web.archive.org Good
To promote the album, Grohl conducted interviews with numerous publications across America, Europe, and Asia. These included Consequence,
18 c consequence.net web.archive.org Good
RockUrLife,
24 c rockurlife.net web.archive.org Good
Critical reception
Erlewine similarly praised Grohl's vocals, saying she successfully adapted to different musical styles.
22 d Erlewine, Stephen Thomas (July 2026). "Filter Albums". Mojo. No. 392. p. 89. Good
Notes
Attributed to multiple references:
23 d allmusic.com web.archive.org Good
19 d clashmusic.com web.archive.org Good
25 c loudersound.com web.archive.org Good
37 b exclaim.ca web.archive.org Good
22 c Erlewine, Stephen Thomas (July 2026). "Filter Albums". Mojo. No. 392. p. 89. Good
@Zmbro: all good in spot-check. Vestrian24Bio 10:46, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Final review

[edit]

Vestrian24Bio 10:51, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Zmbro... Vestrian24Bio 10:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Vestrian24Bio 10:51, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.