Talk:Annabelle Wallis

Inappropriate Awards

This is supposed to be an encyclopedia and this is supposed to be a biographical page of a real person.

It is not appropriate to include a passive-aggressive snarky award for "Most Egregious Age Difference between the Lead and the Love Interest Award" from the "Alliance of Women Film Journalists" here. It is not praise or criticism of Annabelle Wallis and is frankly irrelevant to this article and should never have been added here in the first place. It is a criticism of the film or the filmmakers, not Wallis. (It would not be appropriate to include it on List of awards and nominations received by Tom Cruise and it is not included there. It would even be stretch to justify including such a trivial non-award in the film article The Mummy (2017 film) and again it is not included there either.)

I will remove it soon if someone else does not do it first. (In the unlikely event someone gives an amazingly insightful reason why it might actually belong here I will discuss further.) -- 109.79.173.243 (talk) 07:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Also weirdly the section has been tagged since 2018 as needing expansion. Expand with what? IMDB only lists 2 nominations[1] neither of which are significant, so it is unclear what expansion anyone was realistically expecting. -- 109.79.173.243 (talk) 07:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

I removed the Age Difference "Award", but that left only a one line table. The MTV award nomination was already mentioned above in context where it there was at least some relevance, and since there was no real potential to expand the section with any significant awards or nominations I decided it was best to remove the section entirely.[2] I will try to check back on this in case anyone thinks it needs further discussion but I don't expect that will be necessary. -- 109.79.173.243 (talk) 22:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Date of birth

The date of birth was not reliable sourced and has been removed from the article again, IMDB is not a reliable source.[3] It was recently tagged as citation needed by IJBall[4] but then removed entirely by FMSky[5]

There doesn't seem to be any actual disagreement that her date of birth was 5 September 1984, but better sources are needed. Hopefully someone will find a better source and add it back soon? -- 109.77.193.103 (talk) 18:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

added back with source. turns out the date was wrong FMSky (talk) 07:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Personal life

Why are Stan rs sources unreliable compared to others using the tabloids articles? The one with Russeau not using any sources at all. In Stan's case, on top of all publicists-driven magazines confirming it and them having officially debuted the rs at Golden Globes 2025, here are other references 1) her calling him her bf https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/fashion/fashion-news/a60990515/annabelle-wallis-style-interview/ 2) him calling her his gf https://talkeasypod.com/sebastian-stan/ 3) him saying ILY on TV https://youtu/cannot add proper link/be/zoAGOVvl2yc?si=M7_kBoxsxZyfrZ8z 4) Instagram feed post https://www.instagram.com/p/DGyRMoUvkV6/ Plz specify what type of info is needed on top of this. 46.53.214.195 (talk) 06:51, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Relationship with sebastian

I need editors to contribute to this discussion relating to a dispute over Annabelle Wallis relationship with Sebastian Stan, (see talk page), despite their relationship being confirmed by verified outlets Like People Magazine and where he publicly acknowledge his relationship with her at the Golden Globes, yet particular editors argue that its not “Relevant informations”and persistently reverting or removing edits by other editors. This is also happening to Sebastian Stan page and even editor removed his personal life section despite having sourced. What more could they need? Despite having given sourced material for the matter, particular editor removed it with their reason of “not relevant information” and they dont give supporting reasons why the sourced that have been provided are “not relevant”.

Annabelle previous relationhip was maintain with citations that are partially gossip oriented yet they keep removing her current partner which contain authoritative sources . I just feel like this editors who keep removing it including in Sebastian page are not being professional and may contain personal bias or emotional attachment with the actor. I need opinion or assistance for this matter to reach consensus and finally resolved this dispute. THANK YOU

I will list verifiable sourced material for this information such as People Magazine that meets Wikipedia’s standards and is considered a reputable secondary source under the BLP POLICY wp:BLPSOURCES

https://people.com/sebastian-stan-rare-comment-annabelle-wallis-romance-11719585

https://people.com/sebastian-stan-annabelle-wallis-relationship-everything-to-know-11724268

https://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/a62765595/sebastian-stan-annabelle-wallis-relationship-timeline/

Spywalkers (talk) 16:45, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Maybe two separate interviews where he himself spells it out would be considered more reliable

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/story/sebastian-stan-2025-interview

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/story/inside-sebastian-stans-winning-look-at-the-golden-globes-2025 ~2026-21894-09 (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

There are also verified sources like people that can be used ! https://people.com/sebastian-stan-annabelle-wallis-relationship-everything-to-know-11724268

https://people.com/sebastian-stan-rare-comment-annabelle-wallis-romance-11719585 Spywalkers (talk) 06:15, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

You really don't need to be WP:CANVASSing for on other article's talk pages for this. You've already got a 3O response which should be sufficient. I noticed that the relationship isn't mentioned on this article though - editors may wish to discuss that. -- D'n'B-📞 -- 05:40, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Citation needed tags

The B-class criteria #1 states, The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.

The article is in the following categories:

• Articles with unsourced statements from January 2022,
• Articles with unsourced statements from January 2026. -- Otr500 (talk) 11:42, 23 May 2026 (UTC)