The gratuitous removal of content is exactly the same pattern as [[Talk:Mohamed_Abdullahi_Farmajo/Archive_1#Neutrality|the last time I was involved]]. I wonder if some level of protection for this article would be warranted? [[User:Rublov|rblv]] ([[User talk:Rublov|talk]]) 23:54, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
The gratuitous removal of content is exactly the same pattern as [[Talk:Mohamed_Abdullahi_Farmajo/Archive_1#Neutrality|the last time I was involved]]. I wonder if some level of protection for this article would be warranted? [[User:Rublov|rblv]] ([[User talk:Rublov|talk]]) 23:54, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
: Thanks for letting me know; I've restored the previous version. Regarding protection, let's wait and see what happens. [[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: var(--color-progressive, #36c);">itsJamie</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<b style="color: var(--color-progressive, #F00);">talk</b>]]</sup> 11:39, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
: Thanks for letting me know; I've restored the previous version. Regarding protection, let's wait and see what happens. [[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: var(--color-progressive, #36c);">itsJamie</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<b style="color: var(--color-progressive, #F00);">talk</b>]]</sup> 11:39, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
== About a Recent Blocked User ==
Bush... REVDEL needed. AIV's history [[User:Enćenćecasïdća|Enćenćecasïdća]] ([[User talk:Enćenćecasïdća|talk]]) 19:12, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Revision as of 19:12, 25 June 2026
Talk page
↓↓↓ NEW MESSAGES GO TO THE *BOTTOM*. NOT THE TOP. ↓↓↓
Please add new messages to the bottom of the page. If a conversation is started here, I'll respond here; if it starts on your talk page, I'll respond there.
I prefer to communicate via talk pages. Please only email me if there is a good reason not to conduct a conversation on a talk page. I do not respond to emails regarding link deletions and other issues that should be discussed on your userpage or the article talk page.
Hi when this filter was triggered I think there was a message saying "don't worry your edits haven't been lost", but the edits haven't been automatically reinstated - do I have to do them again? (And, if I do them again is it going to trigger again!?). Thanks! Ansidhean (talk) 13:32, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Per my response here, the filter has been fixed and shouldn't trigger for you again. I did not reinstite your edits because someone else edited it after the false positive. OhNoitsJamietalk13:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Korean Thermonuclear Weapon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
I noticed you salted a bunch of draft pages that Timelash socks have been targeting such as Draft:Draft:Jack Massey Welsj and Draft:Mizzy (prankster). Although it prevents them from creating it under the same page again, I don't think it's an effective measure as LTAs like Timelash use work arounds to evade things such as create protection. There are an infinite number of combinations they could use to bypass the salting such as using capital letter instead of lowercase (as create protection is case sensitive), adding another character to it, using letters with accents, and a bunch of other ways. For example, this LTA created Draft:Mizzy, Draft:Mizsy, Draft:Jack Massey WeIsh (with a capital I), and a bunch of other pages which effectively bypass the create protection. It's probably better to use silent alarms than locks as it creates a honeypot page, which makes it easier to catch them. Similarly, thats why LTA usernames usually don't get added to m:Title blacklist as it effectively makes them harder to catch, and it won't prevent them from using another pattern. Another interesting thing about this LTA is that they intentionally misspelled the pages and requested them to be moved to the salted title at WP:RM/TR by using the excuse of a typo. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 23:03, 4 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Ohnoitsjamie: I was looking at JASON (advisory group) where you reverted the page due to vandalism. I think the rollback you made restored a version that still contains the problem in the lead. The clean version appears to be the March 23rd version by Pave Paws, before the later edits on May 8th. Would you mind revisiting that page and reverting the lead back to that earlier version? Thanks. LocusAndLeaf (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@LocusAndLeaf:This revert of a vandal edit was made by LTA Timelash. Per WP:BRV, all edits made by banned users usually get reverted (regardless of whether it's good faith or bad faith) and usually people don't check the content added. But in this scenario, it appears that the sock revert unfortunately restored a bad revision by mistake. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 14:42, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added 18:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello! I’m Mr. racha. I want to know which of the links are inappropriate. I own none of the kendama companies that I linked down below, and unless you provide legitimate reason for removal, they will be added back. These companies are all individually owned and have their own products and services. I want to add them to grow the kendama community (which I have been a member of for 6 years now) and provide people with as much access to kendama as possible.
Yes please! I actually had it years ago, but it did not carry over when we migrated to the new system (or maybe it was the prior migration? So many migrations). OhNoitsJamietalk13:45, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure.
can you please explain why this addition is getting blocked? everything is public, and in main media press. It is of public interest and is about Reproductive coercion.
Please can you explain why the below is being blocked? it is about reproductive coercion. And is of public interest. Has been spoken about in multiple newspapers and also in Parliament debates - which have been publicized. Proposed wording is below again.. Multiple MPs have spoke about Olivia Nervo's case within parliament/ Thanks
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 Canadian Honours, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Hopkins was added.
While browsing Mohamed Abdullahi Farmajo, I noticed that your revert last October was silently undone a week later. Unfortunately, subsequent edits since then make this a non-trivial mess to clean up.
