Legacy IP contributions for 68.238.165.144
Appearance
Results for 68.238.165.144 talk block log logs global block log filter log
6 September 2019
- 04:1904:19, 6 September 2019 diff hist +617 Talk:Robert Freitas →Needs third party RSes to show notability: Complete incompetence in Freitas' book.
- 04:0304:03, 6 September 2019 diff hist −195 Self-replicating machine →Other references: "Work stations" are not complete "self-replicators" in any way at all and these people have been proven to be incompeent in the past, as well.
- 03:5603:56, 6 September 2019 diff hist −21 Self-replicating machine →See also: irrelevant to actual self-replicators.
- 03:5503:55, 6 September 2019 diff hist −3,046 Self-replicating machine →Self-replicating rapid prototypers: Rapid prototypers do not, in any way reproduce their smalest parts nor their had metal parts in any way to satisfy the "closed loop necessity. Therefore I have deleted this self serving post done by advocates of the rapid prototyping industry. That this article not be protected constanly by these people. Tag: section blanking
- 03:4903:49, 6 September 2019 diff hist −926 Self-replicating machine →Cornell University's self-assembler: I agree that "The machine cannot manufacture individual molecubes, nor do they occur naturally, so its status as a self-replicator is debatable" and it does not satisfy the "close he loop" test to be defined as a "self-replicating machine" as the replication of germs would, for example.
- 03:4203:42, 6 September 2019 diff hist −1,206 Self-replicating machine Undid revision 913578132 by 97.45.129.70 (talk) If it was a working "self-replicating machine" that would be fine but it is not, pics & vids don't prove it but patenting does with lead lines and discriptions allowed by a patent examiner who examines it or witnessed by a public who can purchase it. Tags: Undo section blanking