Draft:Single File Web Apps

Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,918 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · Single File Web Apps (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 3 days ago by Calebmadrigal (talk: D · +) · Last edited 3 days ago by Calebmadrigal

Submission declined on 10 March 2026 by Liance (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Liance 3 months ago. Last edited by Calebmadrigal 3 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 11 November 2025 by Greenman (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Greenman 7 months ago.

Submission declined on 19 October 2025 by Shocksingularity (talk).

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Declined by Shocksingularity 8 months ago.

Submission declined on 16 September 2025 by Haj (talk).

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Haj 9 months ago.

Submission declined on 10 September 2025 by Theroadislong (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Declined by Theroadislong 9 months ago.

Submission declined on 9 September 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk).

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Declined by Pythoncoder 9 months ago.

Comment: You have sources in the examples section, but you need some for the previous sections Shocksingularity (talk) 00:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Comment: Fragments of LLM writing, as noted by previous declines, still persist. – haj ☘ (talk) 02:00, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

A Single File Web App (SFWA) is a type of Single-Page App (SPA) that it is composed of only a static HTML file with no external dependencies (including external images, JavaScript, CSS, etc), and no server components (with the exception of an HTTP Server). Note that the HTML file can have javascript, css, and images - as long as they are embedded in the singular HTML file..^[1]

Overview

Single File Web Apps are designed to run entirely offline or in isolation, with every resource (HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, and fonts) embedded directly into a single HTML file. This makes them uniquely portable and easy to distribute. Users can simply download the file and open it in a browser without any installation or hosting setup.

Features

Self-contained - all assets included directly within the file.
Durable - since Single File Web Apps have no external dependencies or server components, they are more resistant to Software rot than most other types of software^[2]
Portable - can be distributed by email, USB stick, or local file sharing.
Offline-friendly - works without an internet connection once downloaded.
Simple deployment - just drop the file onto any static file host, such as GitHub Pages or a local filesystem.

Identification

In order to identify if a web app is a Single File Web App, you can perform the following steps:

Navigate to the web app, and after it loads, save the web page to your desktop ("HTML only" if given the option) by going to File -> Save Page As (or the equivalent menu name in your browser).
Turn off your internet
Navigate to the HTML file on your desktop, and double-click on it to open it (or open it your browser by going to File -> Open File).
Test that the app works fully while you are disconnected from the internet. If it does, then it's a SFWA. If it does not work while disconnected from the internet, then it is not a SFWA.

Examples

FuzzyGraph^[3] - "a non-binary graphing calculator in a single html file."
Hypervault^[4] - a "personal computing platform in a single html file."
TiddlyWiki^[5] - a "highly customizable non-linear personal notebook and wiki that runs entirely in a single HTML file"
FeatherWiki^[6] - a "the app itself is contained within a single 58-kilobyte HTML file that runs right in your browser"
Inkwash^[7] - "A watercolor simulator in one HTML file"
Slingcode^[8] - "a file encryption app in a single html file."
A collection of single file web apps can be found here^[9]

External links

Intro to Single File Web Apps^[10]

Category:Web applications Category:Software development

References

^ "Single File Web Apps Definition". Note that the HTML file CAN contain javascript, css, and images - as long as they are embedded in the single HTML file
^ "Single File Web Apps". Since Single-File Web App have no external dependencies and require only a browser to run, they should be far less susceptible to software rot than other types of software
^ "FuzzyGraph". a non-binary graphing calculator in a single html file.
^ "Hypervault". a file encryption app in a single html file
^ "TiddlyWiki". highly customizable non-linear personal notebook and wiki that runs entirely in a single HTML file
^ {{cite web|title=FeatherWiki|url=https://feather.wiki%7Cquote= the app itself is contained within a single 58-kilobyte HTML file that runs right in your browser}
^ "Inkwash". A watercolor simulator in one HTML file
^ "Slingcode". personal computing platform in a single html file
^ "single-html-file-apps". GitHub. A collection of self-contained, zero-dependency web applications built as single .html files. These apps run entirely in the browser — no build tools, no servers, no nonsense.
^ Single File Page Apps intro, September 10, 2025

[1] "Single File Web Apps Definition". Note that the HTML file CAN contain javascript, css, and images - as long as they are embedded in the single HTML file

[2] "Single File Web Apps". Since Single-File Web App have no external dependencies and require only a browser to run, they should be far less susceptible to software rot than other types of software

[3] "FuzzyGraph". a non-binary graphing calculator in a single html file.

[4] "Hypervault". a file encryption app in a single html file

[5] "TiddlyWiki". highly customizable non-linear personal notebook and wiki that runs entirely in a single HTML file

[6] {{cite web|title=FeatherWiki|url=https://feather.wiki%7Cquote= the app itself is contained within a single 58-kilobyte HTML file that runs right in your browser}

[7] "Inkwash". A watercolor simulator in one HTML file

[8] "Slingcode". personal computing platform in a single html file

[9] "single-html-file-apps". GitHub. A collection of self-contained, zero-dependency web applications built as single .html files. These apps run entirely in the browser — no build tools, no servers, no nonsense.

[10] Single File Page Apps intro, September 10, 2025

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

Overview

Features

Identification

Examples

See also

External links

References