Jump to content

User talk:Phillipro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Pointalize)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stopover (aviation) (October 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 07:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Pointalize! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 07:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stopover (aviation) (October 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stopover (aviation)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Stopover (aviation), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

[edit]
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

  1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
  2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
  3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
  4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
icon
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Phillipro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

I am requesting an unblock and username change, and I have carefully read the reasons for my block. 1. Disclosure: I am the owner of the website pointalize.com. I understand and acknowledge that this constitutes a paid-contribution and a conflict of interest under Wikipedia's guidelines (WP:PAID). 2. Understanding of Block: I now understand that my actions were a serious error. My username "Pointalize" was promotional, and my attempt to add a link to my own site was a clear violation of the rules against advertising and COI editing. I understand that my good intentions do not excuse breaking the rules. To ensure this never happens again, I will adopt a strict personal policy: I will not edit any articles where I have a conflict of interest. This includes any topics related to credit card rewards, loyalty programs, travel hacking, or my website. I will not use talk pages for these topics; I will avoid them completely. 3. Future Contributions: If unblocked, I will focus my contributions exclusively on topics where I have personal knowledge but no financial stake. As an IT Program Manager, I can contribute by adding reliable sources and correcting technical information on articles related to project management and software development methodologies. As a frequent traveler, I can also help improve articles on specific destinations I have visited. 4. New Username: I am requesting a username change to `phillipro`.

Decline reason:

We do not consider chatbot-generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 06:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
icon
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Phillipro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

I read all the rules now and understood what was wrong even though I thought declaring the COI makes it transparent. I do not want to contribute to those topics anymore as it seems I did not fully understand how Wikipedia works in this regards. That was now a big learning process to me. I just want to rename my username to reflect my personal name in which i acted. I hope you can understand that I did what I did in the best willing, trying to mark everything transparent but just not knowing the full rules till now. I hope you can give me a second chance.

Decline reason:

Please describe the types of edits you would make if unblocked. (Yes, you already did this, but through an AI, so we have no idea if that's actually your intent.) asilvering (talk) 09:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! To help us respond to the request, please do the following:

  1. Review Wikipedia's payment disclosure and conflict of interest policies and guidelines, then explain in your own words how those apply to your block and what you would do differently if unblocked.
  2. Describe the types of edits you would like to make if you were unblocked.

Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Renamed

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Phillipro&oldid=1349721405"