Jump to content

User talk:Boleyn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Boleyn3)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Ive (Mayor of Sandwich, 1348–1349) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Ive (Mayor of Sandwich, 1348–1349) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iveagh Gardens (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Boleyn. Thank you for your work on David Marx. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:37, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei It's as well to look at the page history before sending messages like this! @AndreJustAndre: is the person you should be talking to. PamD 15:38, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@PamD - Thank you for pointing this out. This is a known issue with the review tools. @AndreJustAndre - Please see above. Have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 07:36, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Mariamnei So don't rely on the tools, but perhaps just take a moment to look at the history so that you thank the right editor? PamD 08:19, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No worries :-) Andre🚐 15:32, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles Anderton (rugby union) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Anderton (rugby union) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Anderton (rugby union) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arthur O'Sullivan (disambiguation) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur O'Sullivan (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur O'Sullivan (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ArthananWarcraft (talk) 17:19, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Tryll for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Tryll is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Tryll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zhang 02:44, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

[edit]
May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Boleyn. Thank you for your work on Stan Lewis. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and establish notability as per WP:NATHLETE. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:49, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mariamnei, I created this as a redirect to [[Stanley Lewis==. ~2026-28133-33 changed it to an article. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 18:28, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I missed that. I think I will simply revert to your version. Mariamnei (talk) 09:29, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

[edit]

Hello Boleyn,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Jackson (fl. 1601–1604) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Jackson (fl. 1601–1604) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Jackson (fl. 1601–1604) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

EndTheWikiEditor (talk) 01:09, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas England (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is:

  • a disambiguation page with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" which lists only one extant Wikipedia page (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • a disambiguation page that lists zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 23:06, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Buckley for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Buckley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Buckley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 20:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I created a disambiguation page at that title, you may want to let the person know who overwrote it with an article. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 11:24, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]