Talk:Abd Allah ibn Mas'ud

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Islam: Muslim scholars / Salaf Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim scholars task force.
	This article is supported by the Salaf task force.

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 November 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Untitled

This article should be merged with Abdullah ibn Mas'ud. That article should be kept and this should be removed or redirected their. Pepsidrinka 02:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I keept this since it has an afd on it and is older. i put the "R from merge" tag on the other.--Striver 14:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2024 88.243.129.14 (talk) 17:03, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What about the story of "Mas'ud's Qur'an"?

What about the polemical claim that Mas'ud may have kept a "version" of the Qur'an that was different from Uthman's and would have refused to destroy it even after the order to eliminate all other compilations of the book? Is it true? At least there is this story, which should be mentioned in the article, if anything to be refuted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.213.42.15 (talk) 01:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

you have absolutely no proof to this fact, no one ever heard of this. Of course muslim haters will come up with everything but your lies and accusation are exposed because you don't have anything. 104.35.79.33 (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

saleh Allah alaihe wa salam and NPOV

Inserting this every time Mohammed or Prophet is mentioned makes it read like an Islamic pamphlet rather than NPOV. The phrasing should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Horsie (talk • contribs) 08:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what's the story with him & his relationship to the tarleet and the tajweed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anaccuratesource (talk • contribs) 02:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is hagiography, not history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.66.66.171 (talk) 23:57, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the name is abdallah ibn masud not abdallah soon of masud ! who put this name ! we dont have the right to convert his known name to the translation in english ! abd allah mean the servant of god ! so if we listen you we should call this page into The servant of God son of Masud ?

stupid idiot his name known is Abdullah Ibn Masud,we know that Ibn mean son of but we dont traduce him this is his name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofiane2k6 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:32, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20050315020527/http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Articles/companion/02_abu_bakr.htm; http://www.inter-islam.org/Biographies/abdullahibnmasood.htm; and Companions of The Prophet, Vol.1, by Abdul Wahid Hamid. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:32, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Abdullah ibn Masud. Xoloz (talk) 02:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah, son of Masud → Abdullah ibn Mas'udAbdullah ibn Mas'ud – The name he is most commonly known by in reliable English-language sources. But will not object to Abdullah ibn Masud if others insist; anything rather than the current absurd title. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:42, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as proposed IIRC, Wikipedia avoids the apostrophe forms. Neutral on the alternative without the apostrophe. -- 70.24.250.235 (talk) 04:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Abdullah ibn Masud per nom. Less likely to be controversial than the version with hamzah. No such user (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm, actually that's an 'ayn, written without a curly quote because I thought we were supposed to avoid them in article titles. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

One of his wives

It says in the introduction, "Abdullah had a brother, Utba, and at least two wives in Muhammad's lifetime. One wasyta bint Abdullah, a craftswoman, who supported Abdullah and their child through her handcrafts." I think that it's trying to say, "One was yta bint Abdullah, a craftswoman, who supported Abdullah and their child through her handcrafts." (Notice the space that I added) However, I'm not sure. Does anyone know what, exactly, the person who wrote that was trying to say? PiratePablo (talk) 02:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this article has suffered vandalism, with random words and letters being removed for no particular reason. Abdullah's two wives were named Rayta bint Abdullah and Zaynab bint Abdullah.Petra MacDonald (talk) 03:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ibn Masud and Uthman

All the stories that exaggerate his supposed conflict with Uthman and have the latter as beating him up is usually narrated through Abu Mikhnaf, a Shia Akhbari who is regarded as unreliable and a liar even as a Akhbari let alone as a Hadith Transmitter. 37.231.222.129 (talk) 16:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Uthman beating him up to Death

That Uthman had a conflict with him due to the compilation of the Quran has many sources for it but the Story about his men breaking Ibn Masud's rips is solely narrated through Abu Mikhnaf, a Hardline Shia Historian so mentioning it like this is like giving any credibility about the Stories of Umar beating up Fatima. It also contradicts Uthman praying on him after his death which is mentioned just below this. 37.231.222.129 (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:No original research before you continue. The material you keep removing cites a reliable source (meaning a secondary and scholarly source), while you haven't cited any and you haven't made any arguments that would convince other editors you're acting on anything other than your personal opinion (which relates to the "no original research" policy linked above). When you're reverted, be patient and do not repeat your edits unless you've gained a consensus with other editors on the talk page. Convincing others is only possible if you make your arguments based on what reliable sources say. R Prazeres (talk) 20:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ibn Saad's work isn't even a reilable source in itself according to Wikipedia's standards, it is a mere primary source and should be backed up by other "Acadamic"(Western) sources for it to be used here. And Nabia's work about Aisha is a joke and it is an embarrassment to be still even cited here as it includes fatal mistakes that anyone who has a tiny knowledge about islam's history would not make such as Umm Hakim being Muhammad's aunt and claiming that Muhammad had only 4 wives according to some sources!!! 😂😂😂 37.231.222.129 (talk) 21:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]