Jump to content

User talk:Grosseteste: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
list prior accounts ;)
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


:Fair enough. Please list all other accounts you have used.-- <b>[[User:Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:black">Deep</span>]][[User talk:Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:red">fried</span>]][[Special:UserRights/Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:gold">okra</span>]] </b> 19:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
:Fair enough. Please list all other accounts you have used.-- <b>[[User:Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:black">Deep</span>]][[User talk:Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:red">fried</span>]][[Special:UserRights/Deepfriedokra|<span style="color:gold">okra</span>]] </b> 19:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

:The only one i can recall, as it is the only other one i can remember specifically creating is Slade121. There may be one other from several years ago that i no longer remember the user or password for. Best Regards.

Revision as of 20:29, 27 August 2019

August 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 - SchroCat (talk) 14:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC) [reply]

icon
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Grosseteste (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

This is neither a 'sock puppet' or alternate account, this is an account created to act as a primary account. Other accounts have been created on this IP, but are no longer in use as would be supported by the most recent log in dates on those accounts. Deception was not in anyway the intent with the creation of this account. I can understand the concerns surrounding sock puppetry, but am unsure what flagged this account, has not been used to counteract any edit attempts made by other accounts on this IP, Best Regards.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is neither a 'sock puppet' or alternate account, this is an account created to act as a primary account. Other accounts have been created on this IP, but are no longer in use as would be supported by the most recent log in dates on those accounts. Deception was not in anyway the intent with the creation of this account. I can understand the concerns surrounding sock puppetry, but am unsure what flagged this account, has not been used to counteract any edit attempts made by other accounts on this IP, Best Regards. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is neither a 'sock puppet' or alternate account, this is an account created to act as a primary account. Other accounts have been created on this IP, but are no longer in use as would be supported by the most recent log in dates on those accounts. Deception was not in anyway the intent with the creation of this account. I can understand the concerns surrounding sock puppetry, but am unsure what flagged this account, has not been used to counteract any edit attempts made by other accounts on this IP, Best Regards. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is neither a 'sock puppet' or alternate account, this is an account created to act as a primary account. Other accounts have been created on this IP, but are no longer in use as would be supported by the most recent log in dates on those accounts. Deception was not in anyway the intent with the creation of this account. I can understand the concerns surrounding sock puppetry, but am unsure what flagged this account, has not been used to counteract any edit attempts made by other accounts on this IP, Best Regards. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Fair enough. Please list all other accounts you have used.-- Deepfriedokra 19:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The only one i can recall, as it is the only other one i can remember specifically creating is Slade121. There may be one other from several years ago that i no longer remember the user or password for. Best Regards.