Jump to content

Nimi (king): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →

Oklopfer (talk | contribs)

2 user groups
28,428 edits
undo
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid revision 1361187548 by Oklopfer (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
WP:NOLLM. Temp protection requested.
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 31: Line 31:


== Jainism ==
== Jainism ==
⚫
In [[Jain]] texts, a similar motif as in Buddhist texts can be found, of a king called Nami.{{sfn|Appleton|2016|p=140–1}}
===King Nami's story of renunciation===

In the Jain tradition, King Nami is depicted as a ruler of the Videha kingdom, belonging to the illustrious Ikshvaku lineage, where he governed justly from the city of Mithila, ensuring prosperity, suppressing unrest, and enjoying the luxuries of royalty including a vast seraglio. His reign exemplified worldly success, marked by power, strength, and divine-like pleasures, yet it was this very abundance that set the stage for his profound spiritual awakening.
The catalyst for Nami's renunciation emerged from encounters with the impermanence of life and the suffering inherent in worldly attachments. One day, while inspecting his reflection, Nami discovered a single white hair, a stark symbol of aging and transience that shattered his illusions of eternal youth and dominion. This moment deepened during a hunt, where he witnessed the brutality of death among animals, nearly harming a passing monk in the process, and heard their cries, evoking distress over the violence tied to royal pursuits and prompting reflection on the futility of family, wealth, and power. These experiences, paralleling motifs in broader Janaka lineage narratives, ignited a commitment to ahimsa (non-violence), as Nami recognized the karmic bonds of harm and attachment that perpetuated suffering.
Determined to pursue liberation, Nami resolved to abandon his throne despite entreaties from Indra (Sakra), who urged him to retain his royal duties. He installed his son as successor, retired to a secluded spot, and formally initiated into monastic life under the guidance of the monk Gardabhalin, embracing the Jain path as a wandering, houseless ascetic free from possessions and ties. He adhered rigorously to vows of non-violence, non-attachment, and self-control, highlighting ahimsa as the cornerstone of his transformation by renouncing all forms of injury to living beings.
Nami's renunciation process involved intense austerities, including enduring physical hardships, meditation, and penance to purify accumulated karma. He practiced tolerance toward all creatures, conquered sensory passions, and lived simply, tolerating hunger, exposure, and isolation to dismantle ego and delusion. Through these disciplined efforts, Nami attained kevala jñāna (omniscience), a state of infinite knowledge that revealed the true nature of the soul and the universe, free from all veiling karmas. Ultimately, this culmination led to mokṣa (liberation), where he became a siddha, transcending the cycle of rebirth and attaining eternal bliss as a perfected soul.
This narrative, drawn from the Uttarādhyayana Sūtra (Lecture 23), underscores the Jain emphasis on ahimsa and detachment as pathways to soul liberation, with parallel accounts in texts like the Ādi Purāṇa reinforcing Nami's role in the Videha lineage.<ref>https://jainqq.org/booktext/Political_History_Of_Ancient_India_Romanized/032292</ref>

⚫
According to Appleton in [[Jain]] texts, a similar motif as in Buddhist texts can be found, of a king called Nami.{{sfn|Appleton|2016|p=140–1}}

===Role as a pratyekabuddha and lineage ties===

In Jain texts, King Nami is portrayed as a pratyekabuddha, a solitary enlightened being who attains kevala jnana (omniscience) and ultimate liberation (nirvana) through personal asceticism without establishing a religious order or disseminating teachings to others. This status distinguishes him from tirthankaras, who not only achieve enlightenment but also found monastic communities and ford the path to salvation for countless souls across cosmic cycles. One of only four such pratyekabuddhas recognized in the Jain tradition, Nami's enlightenment underscores the possibility of individual moksha (liberation) in an era lacking a living tirthankara, emphasizing self-reliant spiritual practice rooted in the destruction of karmic bondage.
Nami belongs to the illustrious Ikshvaku dynasty, serving as the foundational king of the Videha kingdom centered in Mithila, and thus stands as an ancestor in the lineage that includes later Videha rulers such as the Janaka kings celebrated in both Jain and Hindu narratives. His royal heritage traces back through the solar dynasty (Suryavamsa), positioning him as a pivotal figure in the mythological genealogy that connects earthly monarchs to divine and enlightened forebears. While distinct from Neminatha, the 22nd tirthankara born into the Yadava clan, Nami's story occasionally intersects with Neminatha's in broader Puranic accounts due to phonetic similarities in their names (Nami and Nemi) and shared themes of renunciation among royal figures, though no direct conflation occurs in canonical texts. These ties highlight Videha's enduring role as a cradle of spiritual sovereignty within the Ikshvaku line.
Symbolically, Nami embodies the Jain ideal of self-realization achieved through profound detachment from sensory pleasures and material attachments, serving as a model for the soul's (jiva) innate potential for purity and autonomy. Unlike parallel Hindu tales where royal sacrifices or rituals like yajnas drive narrative resolution, the Jain version of Nami's journey prioritizes the ethical purification of the jiva by eradicating deluding karmas, portraying enlightenment as an internal conquest rather than an external rite. This emphasis reinforces core Jain doctrines of ahimsa (non-violence) and anekantavada (multiplicity of viewpoints), using Nami's arc to illustrate how worldly power can catalyze introspective liberation when confronted with existential truths.
Jain Puranas, such as Hemachandra's Trishashti Shalaka Purusha Caritra, detail Nami's post-renunciation phase as a wandering ascetic, during which he traverses realms, meditates in solitude, and ultimately ascends to siddhashila (the realm of liberated souls) after eradicating all karmas.

These wanderings, marked by encounters that affirm his enlightened state without proselytizing, profoundly shape Videha's spiritual heritage, inspiring subsequent generations of kings and ascetics in the region to pursue similar paths of detachment and establishing Mithila as a symbolic hub for Jain ethical governance.<ref> https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/king-nami</ref>

===Mention in Jain Agama===

The gāthā
"Jo sahassaṃ sahassāṇaṃ saṅgāme dujjayae jiṇe,
Egaṃ jiṇejja appāṇaṃ, esa se paramo jayo."

Translation:
"Even if a person conquers thousands upon thousands of enemies in a difficult battle, conquering one's own self is the highest victory."

According to the context of the Jain scripture, this verse is associated with King (Prince) Nami.
appears in [[Uttaradhyayana Sutra]] 9.34, which belongs to Chapter 9: "The Pravrajyā (Renunciation) of King Nami."<ref>https://www.wisdomlib.org/jainism/book/uttaradhyayana-sutra/d/doc424219.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 19:31, 26 June 2026

Nimi
Thai depiction of Nimi
TextsRamayana
Genealogy
Parents
ChildrenKing Mithi
DynastySuryavamsha (Janaka vamsha of Janakpur)

Nimi (Sanskrit: निमि, romanized: Nimi) is a king of the Suryavamsha (Solar dynasty) featured in Hindu mythology.[1] He is considered to be the first king of the Videha kingdom and is regarded to be the ancestor to the Janaka lineage of Mithila.[2] Nimi is the grandson of Manu, and a son of Ikshvaku.[3] According to Vayu Purana, King Nimi established a city known as Jayantapura near the Gautam Ashram.[4]

Hinduism

Nimi's yajña

Once, Nimi performed a yajña and invited Sage Vasishtha to be the main priest to conduct the ceremony. However, the sage had already committed to conduct a yajña for Indra, and he told Nimi that he would officiate as the head priest after having conducted Indra's yajña. Nimi went away without replying. Sage Vashistha was under the impression that King Nimi has assented to wait for him.[5][6]

The sage conducted Indra's yajña and rushed to preside at Nimi's yajña only to find that the yajña was already being conducted by Gautama. Sage Vasishtha got angry and cursed King Nimi that "he would cease to live in corporal form" while the king was asleep. Thus, King Nimi was left without his body to heaven with Indra, and stayed there for 9,000,000 years. After the yajña was conducted successfully, the priests asked the gods to return King Nimi to his corporal form. However, he refused to return to his bodily form. The account of Nimi is described by Rama to Lakshmana in the Uttara Kanda of Ramayana.[7]

This episode is also detailed in the Vishnu Purana.[8]

Buddhism

King Nimi is taken to see the Heavens and the Hells

In several traditions, a righteous and edifying Videhan King Nimi or Nemi is mentioned, who travels to heaven and hell in a celestial chariot. The story is mentioned in one text of the Pāli Canon, and two Pāli post-canonical texts. The name Nimi or Nemi is explained as "he brings the lineage full circle like the rim (Pali: nemi) of a carriage wheel".[9] The story relates that a certain King Makhadeva tells his barber that the latter should warn him as soon as the king has his first grey hair, a common memento mori motif found in ancient Indian literature,[10] which goes back to the ancient Indian conception of stages of life.[11] Later on, when his first hairs go grey, and his barber tells him about that, the king goes forth to lead a spiritual life as a hermit, but not before he entrusts his son to do the same when his hair goes grey. The former king is later reborn in a heavenly world. He sees that his descendants all follow the same tradition of becoming hermits when they became old. He then decides to be reborn as the next descendant of the same dynasty, and has the name King Nimi. The story then goes on to say that this king is able to travel to heaven and hell at the invitation of the god Sakka. At the end of the story, King Makhadeva, later reborn as Nimi, is identified as a previous birth of the Buddha, and the barber and heavenly charioteer are identified as the disciple Ānanda.[12]

The story is mentioned in many other early Buddhist texts, both canonical and post-canonical.[13][14] Translator C. A. F. Rhys Davids compared the legend with Dante's Inferno.[15][13] The story of King Nimi visiting heaven and hell is iconic in traditional Thai art, and is easily recognizable for the average Thai person.[16] This story, as well as many similar stories that deal with cakravartin kings, attempts to establish that the spiritual life of renunciation is superior to the worldly life, and the solitary life superior to a married life.[17][18] Moreover, Asian religion scholar Naomi Appleton argues that there is a connection between the stories of the Videhan renouncing kings and the ideal of the solitary Buddha in Buddhism. Solitary Buddhas are often depicted renouncing their worldly life because of certain signs in their environment or on their body, as in the case of Makkhadeva.[18] Finally, according to the scholar Padmanabh Jaini, the story may also have influenced how Buddhist cosmology was interpreted.[19]

In post-canonical Pāli works, the belief is expressed that King Nimi belongs to a long line of Kings descending from Mahāsammata, the first king of humankind. The Buddha is believed to be a descendant of the same dynasty.[20]

Jainism

In Jain texts, a similar motif as in Buddhist texts can be found, of a king called Nami.[21]

See also

References

  1. ^ Garg, Gaṅgā Rām (1992). Encyclopaedia of the Hindu World. Concept Publishing Company. p. 16. ISBN 978-81-7022-374-0.
  2. ^ Mani, Vettam (1 January 2015). Puranic Encyclopedia: A Comprehensive Work with Special Reference to the Epic and Puranic Literature. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 344. ISBN 978-81-208-0597-2.
  3. ^ Anthropology of Ancient Hindu Kingdom. Author – Makhan Jha
  4. ^ Oriental Translation Fund. 1840. p. 389.
  5. ^ Glucklich, Ariel (9 May 2008). The Strides of Vishnu: Hindu Culture in Historical Perspective. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-19-531405-2.
  6. ^ The Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki: An Epic of Ancient India, Volume VII: Uttarakāṇḍa. Princeton University Press. 11 September 2018. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-691-18292-6.
  7. ^ www.wisdomlib.org (28 September 2020). "The Story of Nimi [Chapter 55]". www.wisdomlib.org. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
  8. ^ www.wisdomlib.org (30 August 2014). "Sacrifice if Nimi, origin of Sita and story of Kushadhvaja's race [Chapter V]". www.wisdomlib.org. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
  9. ^ Appleton 2016, pp. 139–40, 164 n.9.
  10. ^ Bloomfield, Maurice (1916). "On Recurring Psychic Motifs in Hindu Fiction, and the Laugh and Cry Motif". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 36: 57–8. doi:10.2307/592669. JSTOR 592669.
  11. ^ Appleton 2016, p. 140.
  12. ^ Appleton 2016, p. 139, 165 n.14.
  13. ^ a b Analayo, Bhikkhu (2017). "The Repercussions Of Lack Of Proper Governance" (PDF). In Mahinda, D. (ed.). Justice and Statecraft: Buddhist Ideals Inspiring Contemporary World. Nāgānanda International Buddhist University. pp. 126–7.
  14. ^ Appleton 2016, p. 139.
  15. ^ Rhys Davids, C. A. F. (15 March 2011). "Review: The Jātaka, or Stories of the Buddha's Former Births. Vol. VI. Translated by E. B. Cowell and W. H. D. Rouse, M.A., Litt.D. Cambridge, 1907". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland. 40 (2): 595. doi:10.1017/S0035869X00080837. S2CID 163337858.
  16. ^ Brereton, B.P. (1986). Images of Heaven and Hell in Thai Literature and Painting (PDF). Conference on Thai Studies in Honor of William J. Gedney. pp. 41–2.
  17. ^ Bhikkhu, Analayo (2015). "The Buddha's past life as a princess in the Ekottarika-agama" (PDF). Journal of Buddhist Ethics. 22: 95.
  18. ^ a b Appleton 2016, p. 144.
  19. ^ Jaini, Padmanabh S. (July 1992). "Ākāravattārasutta: An 'apocryphal' sutta from Thailand". Indo-Iranian Journal. 35 (2–3): 198. doi:10.1007/BF00164932. S2CID 161230878.
  20. ^ Jory, Patrick (2002). "The Vessantara Jataka, Barami, And The Bodhisatta-Kings: The Origin and Spread of a Thai Concept of Power". Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 16 (2): 41–2. JSTOR 40860799.
  21. ^ Appleton 2016, p. 140–1.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nimi_(king)&oldid=1361260691"