Talk:Samsung and unions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Article name scope change: new section |
→Article name scope change: noticed lead content before and edited comments accordingly Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Samsung and unions}} |
{{Template:Did you know nominations/Samsung and unions}} |
||
== Article |
== Article scope == |
||
Although the article's lead previously only referenced Samsung Electronics, the article came to include unions related to [[Samsung Biologics]] and [[Samsung SDI]] as well. Rather than a lead change, I see the article name has become narrower. Would it be appropriate to then move content that is now unrelated to the title out? |
|||
[[User:Ash.tahno|Ash.tahno]] ([[User talk:Ash.tahno|talk]]) 13:35, 15 June 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:54, 15 June 2026
 | The content of 2024 Samsung Electronics strike was merged into Samsung and unions on 3 August 2024. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Future steps
- There are 5 different unions at Samsung Electronics, what are they?
- More background on company unions and unique role that Chaebol corporate structure plays with unionization.
- Profit??? ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- According to this, the four trade unions:
- Nationwide Samsung Electronics Union
- Samsung Electronics Union
- Samsung Electronics' Office Workers' Union
- Samsung Electronics US Union
- ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- According to this, the four trade unions:
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by SL93 talk 17:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the first employee strike action ever at Samsung Electronics by the Samsung trade union is now an indefinite strike? Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/06/business/samsung-first-strike-chips.html
- ALT1: ... that the first strike action ever at Samsung Electronics by the Samsung trade union lasted over three weeks in 2024? Source: http://world.kbs.co.kr/service/news_view.htm?lang=e&Seq_Code=187069
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Samoan branch of the Nazi Party
Date, size, refs, hook, copyvio spotcheck, all GTG. I do have minor concern over the wording "is now", which might become not true at any moment. Ping User:AirshipJungleman29 for his 2c here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, might be a month or more before this appears on the Main Page, and who knows what might have happened by then. Might be best to change to "became" or "became on [date]" or similar. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- ALSO, "Samsung was sued by Samsung Electronics Service Workers trade union for stealing the corpse of a dead worker." why isn't the hook about that?????? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I removed this claim that Samsung was sued, because the lawsuit was over union-busting and not directly related to body snatching. I expanded from two different sources, about the context of suicide and body snatching by police. I will see if there are more sources, and a potential hook from that. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- AirshipJungleman29 Piotrus I've proposed an alt hook to reflect end of strike, and also argue why focusing on corpse is problematic as a hook. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see. ALT1>ALT0, then. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Shushugah the relevant paragraphs of the article need to be copyedited. Also, the article says that a one-day strike took place a month earlier, meaning ALT1 is surely incorrect? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Shushugah has not responded after more than ten days, so I'm marking this for rejection as neither hook is viable. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:05, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Shushugah the relevant paragraphs of the article need to be copyedited. Also, the article says that a one-day strike took place a month earlier, meaning ALT1 is surely incorrect? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see. ALT1>ALT0, then. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- AirshipJungleman29 Piotrus I've proposed an alt hook to reflect end of strike, and also argue why focusing on corpse is problematic as a hook. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- I removed this claim that Samsung was sued, because the lawsuit was over union-busting and not directly related to body snatching. I expanded from two different sources, about the context of suicide and body snatching by police. I will see if there are more sources, and a potential hook from that. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you both for the kind reviews and improving the article. The indefinite strike is over and there have been subsequent strikes. Some articles described this as "one" multi-part strike and others as separate strikes. In any case, I'm sorry didn't reply earlier and respect your decision to close. Wish you all a lovely day! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 18:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Article scope
Although the article's lead previously only referenced Samsung Electronics, the article came to include unions related to Samsung Biologics and Samsung SDI as well. Rather than a lead change, I see the article name has become narrower. Would it be appropriate to then move content that is now unrelated to the title out? Ash.tahno (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2026 (UTC)