User talk:Shoestringnomad: Difference between revisions
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:FYI, A21sauce attempted to file a report about you, but I have rejected the report out of hand. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 20:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
:FYI, A21sauce attempted to file a report about you, but I have rejected the report out of hand. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 20:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
::Thank you, [[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]. I was wondering what was up. :) [[User:Shoestringnomad|Shoestringnomad]] ([[User talk:Shoestringnomad#top|talk]]) 20:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
::Thank you, [[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]. I was wondering what was up. :) [[User:Shoestringnomad|Shoestringnomad]] ([[User talk:Shoestringnomad#top|talk]]) 20:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
||
:So you erased it, [[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]], is that even allowed? You hate women too, fan~tastico.--[[User:A21sauce|A21sauce]] ([[User talk:A21sauce|talk]]) 21:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:04, 9 June 2021
FYI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 01:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, Satellizer. Shoestringnomad (talk) 02:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
ANI notice

Your recent editing history at Dianne Morales shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Calm down, dude - you have a notice here. Sometimes it's better to take a breather and come back when things have calmed down.--A21sauce (talk) 17:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- @A21sauce: You think I should go to the Talk page with a brand new IP user that's only made edits I find unfitting of Wikipedia? That sounds productive. What is your rationale for listing a non-notable membership and using it to list an endorsement that does not meet Wikipedia policy regarding political endorsements?? Your ANI Notice is completely bogus, and you're using intimidation tactics to keep something on a page that you want but that doesn't belong. Shoestringnomad (talk) 17:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. A21sauce (talk) 20:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- FYI, A21sauce attempted to file a report about you, but I have rejected the report out of hand. —C.Fred (talk) 20:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, C.Fred. I was wondering what was up. :) Shoestringnomad (talk) 20:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- So you erased it, C.Fred, is that even allowed? You hate women too, fan~tastico.--A21sauce (talk) 21:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)